(An article published by the Asian Human Rights Commission: AHRC-ETC-013-2011, May 16, 2011) -Dr Gaffar Peang-Meth
I write often that our future and what we do are not dictated by what we know. It is how we think, more than what we know, that determines the quality of our life and the quality of anything we do.
I also write often that though our brains can store countless facts and data, similar to keeping rocks in a box, that information is good and useful only if we can explain, interpret, evaluate, compare, and relate it to other facts and other situations around us, which requires critical thought, a capacity that can be taught and learned.
And Lord Gautama Buddha (563 B.C.-483 B.C.) was not only one of the world’s great critical thinkers, he was also an activist from whom we can learn a lot.
Officially, 96.4 percent of the 14 million Cambodians are Buddhist; and there are more than 4,000 Buddhist monasteries scattered across the country, housing more than 50,000 monks. Theoretically Cambodians are followers of Buddha. Are they? What did Buddha teach about thought, action, and change?
I have written about a prominent Buddhist monk in Phnom Penh who questioned quietly how many monks (and how many Buddhists) really understand Buddha’s teaching. I have also mentioned a Khmer scholar who asked in his writing whether Khmer Buddhist beliefs are only “skin deep”, and pleaded for some serious “soul searching” amongst the Khmer Buddhists.
These are important points, because a misunderstanding of Buddha’s teaching could hinder Cambodia’s development and Cambodians’ struggle for rights and freedom. Personally, I believe a correct application of Buddha’s teaching could advance Cambodians’ search for rights and freedom.
Buddha’s teachings: Are Cambodians learning?
As Buddha himself said, “However many holy words you read, however many you speak, what good will they do if you do not act upon them?” The German playwright, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote, “Knowing is not enough, we must apply. Willing is not enough, we must do.”
So in my writing, I have reiterated Buddha’s words from 2,500 years ago: “We are what we think… What we think, we become” and “He is able who thinks he is able”. This latter quote should humble us today as specialists encourage positive thinking and the development of a “yes, we can” attitude to help make problems easier to solve and predicaments easier to cope with.
An activist, Buddha said man is responsible for what he becomes and that he is not a product of karma: Man can improve his life here and now, and not wait for the next life. “I do not believe in a fate that falls on men however they act; but I do believe in a fate that falls on them unless they act.” “I never see what has been done; I only see what remains to be done.” “Pay no attention to the faults of others, things done or left undone by others. Consider only what by oneself is done or left undone.”
So, what should man do? “To be idle is a short road to death and to be diligent is a way of life,” Buddha said, and therefore, “Work out your own salvation. Do not depend on others… No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path.” In other words, man can do something to improve his lot in life and not to count on others.
These are themes I have emphasized in my writing. Think positively, dream big, imagine the world we want to see, demonstrate a can-do attitude, and take the first step, however small.
While Buddha says, “An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that exists only as an idea,” he also warned, “One thought leads to heaven, one thought leads to hell.” So we learn how to think and apply the thought that leads to heaven!
Buddha’s principles of “Four Reliances”
And so, Buddha provided man with a guide in the principles of “Four Reliances”: First, to rely on the spirit and meaning of the teaching, not the words; second, to rely on the teaching, not on the personality of the teacher; third, to rely on the wisdom in the teaching, not the superficial interpretation; and fourth, to rely on the essence of our own pure Wisdom Mind (obtained through the eightfold-path), not on judgmental perceptions.
One lesson taught by Buddha, which I never tire of repeating, is his emphasis on “reason” and on accepting and living up to that which is to “the good and benefit of one and all”.
“Do not believe in anything because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumoured by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.”
What we do today matters most
Buddha’s “Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment,” were not meant to discard the past as a lesson. He never tells man not to learn from the past, but he tells man not to be stuck in the past, not to live in it because it locks him in and provides him with no way to move forward. What has happened, happened, there is nothing one can do to change that. And he says, “Nothing is permanent.”
He warns us not to waste time dreaming about a future that is yet to come, but to focus on the importance of today: We have 24 hours to do something today, here and now, to avoid the pitfalls of the past, and to affect the kind of future we want to see. Man, not karma, is responsible for the future. Think positively, think creatively and critically, and act now to build a new world.
“Each morning we are born again,” Buddha says, “What we do today is what matters most.”
Any individual with common sense can see how all the above—and many other teachings by Buddha not mentioned here—apply to the life of Cambodians in particular, as they face difficult times.
Learning to relate
Last month, at about the same time Cambodians celebrated the New Year 2555 of the Buddhist Era, the United States also celebrated the 150th anniversary of the American Civil War (1861-1865), the bloodiest conflict in its history. I used the occasion to write about how two general officers of two warring armies (which suffered 630,000 killed and more than one million injured) worked out in dignity and mutual respect the terms of surrender and organized a moving ceremony of disbanding the defeated army with “honour answering honour”.
As the Civil War ended, the United States motto, E pluribus unum—Out of many, one—became alive, the many states of the United States became one nation, peace and reunification subsumed years of animosities, and the American Nation became stronger and united.
I do not know what lessons Cambodian readers may have drawn from that article, but the picture of two adversaries coming to deal with one another with integrity and humanity at the conclusion of the Civil War was a far cry from Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge victors executing the vanquished and turning the country into killing fields.
The divided warring states of the United States were able to reunite and rebuild, whereas the four warring Cambodian factions, even blessed with the 1991 Paris Peace Accord, were cowed into submission by Prime Minister Hun Sen and his ruling Cambodian People’s Party.
Cambodians who oppose Hun Sen’s autocratic regime can learn from India’s political and spiritual leader Mahatma Gandhi, who observed, “A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.”
Gandhi, 5 feet and 3 inches, and weighing a mere 100 pounds, told the world, “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.”
And Gandhi’s mind was made up and unshakable. Gandhi was determined to lead his people in a non-violent struggle to end the British Empire’s rule over India. He and his people won.
As US President John F Kennedy said, “A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on.” Ideas were what interested Buddha.
Thomas Jefferson was only 32 when he wrote in the 1776 Declaration of Independence, a sentence that has inspired men and women around the world: “We believe these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…” The declaration became one of the world’s most admired historical documents.
Fifty-six Americans—lawyers, jurists, merchants, plantation owners, farmers—signed the Declaration. They knew what would become of them should they be captured by the British and charged with treason. As the story is told, of the 56 signers, five were captured and tortured until they died; nine fought and died in the Revolutionary War; 12 had their homes ransacked and burned; two lost their sons in the War; another had two sons captured.
Nearly one hundred years after independence, Americans fought between themselves over the issues of human rights and slavery. The Civil War over, the fight for equal rights never stopped. American children go to school, learn the sacredness of the self-evident truths. And today’s Americans continue their relentless fight to ensure that the self-evident truths live on.
The struggle of the Cambodians
As self-described followers of Buddha’s teaching, Cambodian democrats who are generally Buddhist, should be successful in their struggle, the goals of which are clear and worthy: Keep the Cambodian nation from being overtaken by expansionist neighbours; protect the country’s national independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; protect and defend the individual rights and freedoms of the Cambodian people in accordance with the Khmer Constitution and all relevant international conventions to which Cambodia is a party.
Yet Cambodian democrats are in disarray. Individually and as opposition parties they fight and tear at one another more ferociously than they fight the dictatorial regime in power. When Cambodian democrats call for national unity, they generally mean unity behind their respective leadership and party.
Cambodians of my generation, many of whom remain politically active in Cambodia, learned in elementary school that “Samakki chea kamlaing,” or “L’union fait la force” –or “Unity makes strength”. It is a common precept. Among Cambodians of all generations however, Buddha’s teachings provide the foundation for unity across political parties. The teachings illuminate an apolitical way forward.
How far the strand of Cambodian authoritarianism extends can be worrisome. I find it astounding that some Cambodians find it appropriate to raise doubts about people and pejoratively brand them, because they hold different political opinions and methods for dealing with problems.
I would not have believed this until in an e-mail someone I do not know charged that I am a “Vietnamese who pretend(s) to be Khmer… to destroy Khmers” because of my criticism of Hun Sen’s autocracy, asserting that I have not written on the most recent Khmer-Thai spat over Preah Vihear Temple, nor have I written about Kampuchea Krom, and that right now is not the time to criticize Hun Sen but to unite all Khmers against Thailand’s aggression!
I recall Buddha’s words: “There is nothing more dreadful than the habit of doubt. Doubt separates people. It is a poison that disintegrates friendships and breaks up pleasant relations. It is a thorn that irritates and hurts; it is a sword that kills.”
Source: www.ethicsinaction.asia/archive
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Hanzze on October 9, 2011 at 10:29am "A man may plunder as long as it serves his ends, but when others are plundered, he who has plundered gets plundered in turn. A fool thinks, 'Now's my chance,' as long as his evil has yet to ripen. But when it ripens, the fool falls into pain. Killing, you gain your killer. Conquering, you gain one who will conquer you; insulting, insult; harassing, harassment. And so, through the cycle of action, he who has plundered gets plundered in turn."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn03/sn03.015.than.html
Buddha Dharma leads us out of this circle, one first step is just do be not involved in politics.
Letting go of doubt means letting go of opinions. We never should give up the doubt that peace is possible step by step. Spreading words of calm is a way to reduce this kind of doubt. *smile*
We have been murder, thieves and so on for so many times in our past. Nothing comes within it self and in the present moment we can reduce new future causes. What ever was wrong will ripe in any way. Understanding cause and effect and to localize the doer as the own mind will make us understanding the right steps for a change.
Karma is not sprung out from our own action only but also from others' one. for example, when we sit still in meditation; it means, we do the good thing, do nothing wrong for others. But others always do differently from us. A man comes to make a fire and starts burning near us. Ask if we feel the heat of the fire? Yes we did. Ask if we did the bad thing? No, we did nothing wrong. Why we experience the heat? Because we sit near the fire made by another man. So is it our own karma? No, it is not. But it is another man's karma. It can be concluded that karma is classified into 2 kinds : one is SAKAKARMA, means the action that we do by ourselves. Another is PARAKARMA, means the action that other people do but brings effect to us, too.
Permalink Reply by Hanzze on October 10, 2011 at 1:01pm Dear venerable Mahaphirum,
Thank you very much for the explaining. Maybe I do not understand the sample well. So please let me bring up some questions and thought about my understanding.
Who had the intention to sit down there? How does it come that one reaches the point to have the intention of sitting down there? If he feels heat and he does not move it would be the same if somebody lies hungry on the ground and means it is the kamma of others that he starves.
I never heard or read about fruits that are caused by others.
Karma is not something linear and easy to reproduce.
How can we say that he (the sample that you use to bring up) did nothing wrong. Cause and effect can be many live times apart. A seed needs the right soil and water to flourish.
I never heard about saka kamma and para kamma as a kamma of different qualities. Maybe it refers just to a different viewpoint. I guess it is very logical that or kamma (action) brings effects also for others, but from the viewpoint of the cause one self is responsible at least.It might be that one (the situation and all its karmic situations) is the soil or the water that the seed can flourish.
That does not mean, that we should say: "Look, its his own fault!" or "So much bad kamma. Your own fault"
We are not able to make our action undone but we are able to understand them and if we do we will on one hand not continue to do wrong and on the other hand the fruits of bad actions will not harm as that much, us we understand that it is just natural and nobody else to claim for it.
I guess the main and important message the gave was that we should take care of our mind state. If there is no ill-will no seek for revenge there will be nothing additional to fear since the time we start to observe. What was happened, we are not able to change as much as we are not able to change other people.
Please don't feel defensive as an result of my post and please correct me if some of my thought or maybe all are wrong.
I am also very interested in this two "kinds" of kamma (saka - and para kamma) If you would have some information about those, I would be very happy.
Thank you very much for your effort and compassion to explain.
with metta
Hanzze
Hello Hanzze,
Thanks for your impression.
I'd like to say more about the Sakakamma and Parakamma.
As far as it is known by us that our Buddha focuses only on the intention. "O Bhikkhus ! I call the intention a karma.", Buddha's word. Therefore, everyone has his/her own intention. or he/she possesses his/her decision-making to think, speak or do something desirable by him/her. Everything is forerun by mind. Good or bad intention is up to the decision-owner (kammassakata) if he/she thinks, speaks or does with a malicious intention, the mentally malicious effect will reverse to him/her first then the effect of bad speech or action will go to others concerned. likewise the good intention. Another example, we want to move a big stone. we need two people to do this. when moving the stone by pushing; you try very best to do but another man tries not or pretends to try. Ask if the stone will move? No. why the stone not moves? Because you have only one good intention but another is ineffective. On the contrary, if the intention had been equal; the stone would have been moved. The goal you'd like to reach is not accomplished. So it can be concluded that your own karma(sakakamma) is good but another(parakamma) is bad. Therefore, the effect is ineffective. Hope you will understand.
Permalink Reply by Hanzze on October 11, 2011 at 2:39am Thank you dear venerable,
Actually I don't understand. Why should it be bad if one likes something one not? The one liking to move the stone might have a good intention (dont know, he likes to help somebody to build a housing) the other might have another good intention (dont know, maby I dont likes to kill the animals around the stone).
If we would know the intention of both in that way, from this viewpoint it would be even more virtues what the man, you called him the one with bad intention, did. He just had the intention of not harming. While the other had the intention of "helping", actually more attachment and more defilement, maybe pure greed was his intention to move the stone.
So who's intention is better?
We can not judge others intention, because we don't know them. We can only look at there deeds. Do they harm, do they force greed, do they act in delusion? We can follow wise and parting from unwise, but we can not by force change there intentions or even there done acts.
I also do not understand why your refer saka (own) kamma as good and para (other) kamma as bad.
Maybe you have some good resources about your ideas about kamma, I can not find any equality to the Buddha Dhamma I have came in contact till now and I also have logical problem to understand what you try to say.
For sure there is kamma that can produced together, other schools call it collective kamma. From a Theravada and according the historical canon, it will be even if it is viewed as made together also a "individual" effect.
We can see such things very good now in Cambodia. Many delusion an greed leads to deforestation and in return there are many who are victims of flood out of there earlier acts. It does not mean that they have been involved directly in this deforestation in this present existence but if we look more in detail we would even see the connections in there present existence.
From a Buddhist view it would be something new that somebody else should be responsible for ones good or bad fruits. That would lead us immediately in in-responsibility, hypocrisy and judging of others and not a little of peace. For sure such ideas would lead people to similar ideas as they are in western world, the idea of rules and control and such views would lead into politic and struggle and away from the eightfold path and practice of Buddha dhamma.
Maybe I understood something wrong.
With metta
Hanzze
July 29, 2012 from 9am to 12pm – Bodhikaram Temple
0 Comments 0 LikesAugust 25, 2012 from 9am to 12pm – Tom Brown Arena
0 Comments 0 Likes|
Powered by Conduit
|
© 2012 Created by Khmer Buddhist Network.